By Chris Dornin, co-founder of Citizens for Criminal Justice Reform
Parole and prison officials will meet with 40 lawmakers on June 25 to explain a scathing performance audit of the Parole Board that was published in April. The review found dozens of major problems, some of which are probably unsolvable unless the state budget gives the Parole Board better funding.
The hearing before the full House Judiciary Committee and the Criminal Justice Committee starts at 10 a.m. in Room 208 of the Legislative Office Building. This is one of the most important meetings of the last few years on New Hampshire criminal justice reform and the problems that need reforming.
The entire Parole Board and top leaders in Corrections answered tough questions about the performance audit in April before the Legislative Fiscal Committee. Vilay Skidds, a co-author of the report, laid out dozens of major problems her team discovered. Here’s a sample.
“We found information the Board received when evaluating inmates for parole was not always complete and mental health and substance abuse information was not always accurate because neither Board Members nor staff had access to this information.”
“We also found there was no process to standardize the criteria used to make parole decisions leading to variations in how Board Members used and prioritized inmate information.”
“The Board also did not have a process to review parolee records as required by law to determine whether supervision levels were appropriate or whether the parole --_the_parolee_should_be_brought_back_before_the_Board.”
“We found the Board did not establish administrative rules for some of its processes and imposed additional requirements which were not formally adopted.”
“It also did not have policies and procedures for operational tasks leading to heavy reliance on institutional knowledge to carry out operations. This resulted in non-compliance with some of its own rules and statutes, including the Right-To-Know Law.”
“Finally, we found the Board did not have a process to collect data or evaluate whether its activities contributed to its overall mission of protecting public safety.”