The defendant raises two issues on appeal. The first is whether he was required, as a self-employed homeimprovement contractor, to identify the temporary work sites where he performed his work as his “work address” under the SORB registration statute, G. L. c. 6, § 178E. The second is whether the defendant’s condition of probation — that he was “not to 6 work, volunteer, [or] reside with children under [sixteen] years old” — prohibited him from performing home-improvement services at a house where a young child resided and provided adequate notice of such a prohibition.
DECISION LINKS: See attached pdf file or links below.
https://cases.justia.com/massachusetts/supreme-court/2020-sjc-12875.pdf?...
If that link doesnt work try these
https://law.justia.com/cases/massachusetts/supreme-court/2020/sjc-12875....
https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2020/10/05/t12875.pdf
Watch the actual Supreme Court Argument: https://boston.suffolk.edu/sjc/pop.php?csnum=SJC_12875
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Mass Decision Harding Working as Contractor from Home.pdf | 99.25 KB |